What Really Happened To PDM And Why Is Wavel John Charles Ramkalawan Feeling Like He Was Used

Seychelles freedom Party taught on David Pierre’s case

Seychelles freedom Party looked at the move made by David Pierre to go to the courts as a scheme to give back what little dignity PL had left and in the midst of all this provide leverage to James Alix Michel in implementing Partial Reform and Serving over his sham elected mandate.

So definitely SFP saw that David Pierre was going to lose his case in order to provide the judiciary  cover in showing its independence, also to show that if really peoples party was as corrupted as the oppositions claimed they are then he would have had the odds in his direct favor.  So a game well played by David Pierre extra few bucks earned and well deserved by the judiciary.

The Approach Used by the SNP In view Of David Pierre’s Court Case

The Seychelles National Party Under the leadership of Wavel Ramkalawan took it into themselves to discredit people’s party to the general public by spreading the word of Fada himself that since PL is behind the PDM creation and financing the case was a ploy to squeeze in Pierre to the assembly for the leader of opposition seat. To this point an all out war whereby Wavel Ramkalawan even fought for Defacto leader of opposition post and according to his entourage has won and holds this title at present.

This defensive move to protect his post and title Ramkalawan took things to the street where people like James Bacco and many more where campaigning door to street corners telling supporters to rally at the court house on the eighteenth to scare Pierre and the judges to force them into making a compromise so that David Pierre would not be allowed in since international observers where overseeing our present situation in the political arena. This materialized but unfortunately for the SNP only Bacco himself and two other die hard SNP distributor man turned up at the court house and their racketing was very weak to create any disturbance.

Did David Pierre Really Stand a Chance to win This Case

If the boycott for Real Democracy had gone south rather from the result that was announced, yes david Pierre might have stood a chance but since it did not then he had no chance in the world.
The constitution is clear and straight forward despite the fancy pancy from lawyer Hoaureau on behalf of David Pierre just a few months after Jane Carpin’s case.

The whole play roll displayed truth to David Pierre’s loss to this one. First the engagement of Attorney frank ally as representation to Electoral Commission and Hendrick Gappy, the attorney General asking everyone underneath the court house in employment who was representing Gappy and finally office of the president stressing on the electoral Reform right after a 25 – o win and back into the one party state.



Conclusion

Wavel  John Charles Ramkalawan missed the obvious truth that the onus was on him and the SNP, yes the European union and other international delegations where stressing with Michel to conduct reform and keep the peace but they were also told that the peace is there and that it is rather the opposition parties that likes to create havoc where there is none and example was totally given when a campaign to force judges to conduct justice by arrogance at the court house was in vain since the law was applied, this also gave credibility to PL when they said we never created David Pierre and PDM. This also provides Michel with a “Porte Ouvert” to manipulate the reforms for another ten to fifteen years to come to his stay is to be two years tops and handing over to Danny Faure.

Seychelles Freedom Party gets a plus one from international community and the merry band of three gets a vogue face and a silent ear.

SFP clearly said Pierre would lose because we have them on offence and at the round table yet the said to be main oppositions made it clear we will not discuss and went on a boycott without analysis. The following day of the so big boycott broadcast on sbc there they were at the table asking for another election even if the reform where not even at ground breaking point.

Stay tune for the full technical details of the court case and on the meeting at the electoral commission’s office.