Questions should have been asked was:
When exactly did these incidents happen?
Why report it now?
In the absence of no broken hymen and agreed report from doctor to a slight widening of the female part of the eight year old, why was the doctor not asked if only a finger could cause this or other things such as bicycle large movements or simply human development?
There are many more questions i should asked based on this case but my main one would be what exactly was the four year ruling based on if not hearsay and verbal accusations?
See for yourself below, note that i have omitted the names and some key details as it may be offensive for some bloggers, but as it is a matter of national importance when it comes to free and fair trial as well as regards for the law it is in everyone's interest to know how you can simply be pointed a finger at and lose 4 years with nothing more than accusations.